Audacity and Praat as Pedagogical Tools: Analysing Fluency and Pronunciation Accuracy


  • Xavier Martin-Rubio



fluency, pronunciation accuracy, pedagogical tools, self-reflection


The main premise of this article is that asking students of English to analyse their oral productions using measures from the Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency approach might be beneficial for their language learning process. We describe a project that students of the English Phonetics and Phonology course of the English Studies degree at Universitat de Lleida (Catalonia, Spain) carried out during the 2019/2020 academic year. The project helps students improve their transcription skills while stimulating reflection on pronunciation aspects. For this purpose, Praat and Audacity software packages are employed, which are especially suitable to deal with phonemic phenomena that need to be covered in the course, although it is possible to think of adaptations of the project to other types of students so that they could still benefit from it.


Arnold, J. (ed). 1999. Affect in language learning. Cambridge: CUP.

Boyd, J. and M. Rudvin. 2018. Accommodation, Cooperation and Face Strategies in ELF: A Case Study of Institutional Power in Migrant Settings. In C. Martin-Rubió (ed.) Contextualising English as a Lingua Franca: from Data to Insights. Newcastle-upon- Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 170–189.

Brown, H. D. 2004. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 4th Edition. New York: Longman.

Canagarajah, S. 2015. Clarifying the Relationship between Translingual Practice and L2 Writing: Addressing Learner Identities. Applied Linguistics Review 6(4), 415–440.

Chambers, F. 1997. What do we mean by fluency? System 25(4), 535–544.

Czwenar, I. 2014. Analysing Spoken Language for Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Some Methodological Considerations. In W. Szubko-Sitarek, Ł. Salski and P. Stalmaszczyk (eds.) Language Learning, Discourse and Communication. Cham: Springer, 81–92.

Fortunato-Tavares, T. et al. 2017. Children who stutter exchange linguistic accuracy forprocessing speed in sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 38(2), 263–287.

Hieke, A. E. 1985. A componential approach to oral fluency evaluation. Modern Language Journal 69(2), 135–142.

Jiménez Arias, I. 2004. Treating Students’ Errors in Oral Production. Letras 36, 175–188.

Ladefoged, P. 1982. A Course in Phonetics. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Leal, C. F. 1995. A pause as a cause of change. ERIC document ED 379935. Rockville, MD: Educational Resources Information Center.

MacIntyre, P. D. et al. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal 82(4), 545–562.

Michel, M. 2017. Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency (CAF). In S. Loewen and M. Sato (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 50–68.

Starkweather, C. W. 1987. Fluency and stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Tench, P. 2011. Transcribing the Sound of English: A Phonetics Workbook for Words and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wennerstrom, A. 2000. The role of intonation in second language fluency. In H. Riggenbach (ed.) Perspectives on fluency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 102–127.




How to Cite

Martin-Rubio, X. (2021). Audacity and Praat as Pedagogical Tools: Analysing Fluency and Pronunciation Accuracy. Philologia, 19(1), 37–50.



Nauka o jeziku/Linguistics