Dickens’s Use of Non-Fluency Features in Spoken Discourse

Authors

  • Shigeo Kikuchi ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/philologia.2016.14.13_14.3

Keywords:

normal non-fluency features, authorial intent, Dickens's main concern

Abstract

This article examines Charles Dickens’s use of ‘normal non-fluency features’ in his characters’ discourse, and probes the speakers’ and the author’s intent behind the use of them. ‘Normal non-fluency features’ means features of non-fluency in conversation such as hesitation, interruption, gap-fillers and the like. They are, as Hughes (1996: 39) points out, a sign of positive participation by conversational participants. In addition, they have another function when they appear in a written text, because, in the case of a drama, ‘the dramatist must have included them on purpose’ (Short 1996: 177). By looking at a number of Dickens’s works, it is possible to infer that he is particularly interested in family relations.

References

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Benveniste, É. 1966. Problèmes de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Gallimard.

Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. 1997. Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: CUP.

Hughes, R. 1996. English in Speech and Writing: Investigating Language and Literature. London: Routledge.

Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative Analysis and Oral Versions of Personal Experience. In J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.

Ross, J. R. 1970. On Declarative Sentences. In R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (eds) Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn, 222–272.

Short, M. 1996. Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London: Routledge.

Yamamoto, T. 1974. David Copperfield. Charles Dickens no Buntai [Charles Dickens’s Style]. Tokyo: Nan-un-do, 110–152.

Downloads

Published

24-03-2021

Issue

Section

Nauka o jeziku/Linguistics

How to Cite

Dickens’s Use of Non-Fluency Features in Spoken Discourse. (2021). Philologia, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.18485/philologia.2016.14.13_14.3

Similar Articles

1-10 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)