Do indirect tests of English intonation measure students’ ability in performing English nucleus placement?
Ključne reči:
direct test, indirect test, intonation, nucleus placement, reliability, validity, National Centre for University Entrance ExaminationsApstrakt
This study focuses on nucleus placement in English intonation and attempts to investigate (1) the reliability and validity of indirect tests on nucleus placement, and (2) the credibility of English proficiency tests as a predictor of students’ ability in nucleus placement. Three tests were administered to 111 Japanese EFL university students: (a) an English proficiency test, (b) an indirect test on nucleus placement, and (c) a direct test (oral performance test) on nucleus placement.
The results obtained are: [1] the internal reliability of the direct test was very high, but the internal reliability of the indirect test was very low, and [2] there were no significant correlations among the three tests. These results indicate that indirect tests and English proficiency tests cannot predict the students’ performance of nucleus placement. This research also made us realize the responsibility of teachers to receive adequate phonetic training to learn to auditorily discriminate between their students’ correct and incorrect performances.
Reference
Brown, J. D. 1996. Testing in Language Program. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Buck, G. 1989. Written Tests of Pronunciation: Do They Work? ELT Journal 43, 50-56.
Komazawa, S. and A. Ito. 1997. A Written Test of Stress in Connected Speech in the NCUEE-test: its Reliability & Validity. Chuubu Chiku Eigo Kyoiku Gakkai Kiyo 27, 285-292.
Hashimoto, M. and M. Taniguchi. 2003. English Sounds and Oral Communication: Approach to Living English. Tokyo: English Phonetic Society of Japan.
Inoi, S. 1995. The Validity of Written Pronunciation Questions: Focus on Phoneme Discrimination. Language Testing in Japan. Tokyo: JALT.
Lado, R. 1961. Language Testing. London: Longman.
Shimizu, Y. et al., 2004. Exploring Cultural Issues: Practice in TOEIC Test Format. Tokyo: Seibido.
Shirahata, T. 1991. Validity of Paper Test Problems on Stress: Taking Examples from Mombusho’s Daigaku Nyushi Senta Shiken. Shizuoka Daigaku Kyoiku Gakubu Kiyo, 23, 161-172.
Taniguchi, M. 2001. Japanese EFL Learners’ Weak Points in English Intonation. English Phonetics 4, 45-54.
Yamauchi, S. 1992. Validity of Measuring Oral Production Ability on Pencil- and-paper Tests. Kyushu Eigo Kyoikugaku Kenkyu Kiyo 20, 72-82.
Downloads
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.