The Pragmalinguistic and Sociopragmatic Aspects of English: Applying Analytic Abilities to Foreign Language Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/philologia.2013.11.11.5Keywords:
e-mail requests, non-native speakers (NNSs), pragmatics, perlocutionAbstract
The current paper provides results of a study that investigated the usage of pragmatics by non-native speakers (NNSs) of English when making e-mail requests. Initial data from the study shows that NNSs differ from native speakers (NSs) in politeness and perlocution (i.e., the effect that an utterance has on its recipient) of their English e-mail requests. The data also show that NNSs and NSs differ in the specific pragmatic strategies related to the structure and content used in their e-mail requests. Additional data from this study indicates that explicit instruction can positively affect the perlocution of NNS e-mail requests and the long-term usage of pragmatic features found in the e-mail messages of NNSs, although the greatest effect is observed in the appropriate usage of structural features. The results of this study support the need for instruction of e-mail pragmatics to second language learners and reveal the possible benefits of such instruction.
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2001. Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: CUP, 13–32.
Blum-Kulka, S., j. House & G. Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, Nj: Ablex Publishing.
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Chen, C. F. E. 2001. Making e-mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. St. Louis, MO.
Essid, j. 2003. Basics of electronic writing. Writer’s Web. [Internet]. Available at: http:// writing2.richmond.edu/writing/wweb/ewriting.html [20.11.2013].
Ford, S. 2003. “Dear, Mr Shawn”: A lesson in e-mail pragmatics. TESOL Journal 12, 39–40.
Gains, J. 1999. Electronic mail: a new style of communication or just a new medium?: An investigation into the text features of e-mail. English for Specific Purposes 18 (1), 81–101.
Hacker, D. 2003. A Writer’s Reference. Fifth edition. New York: St. Martin’s.
Hall, j. K. 1999. The prosaics of interaction: The development of interactional competence in another language. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: CUP, 137–151.
Hambridge, S. 1995. RFC 1855: Netiquette Guidelines. [Internet]. Available at http://www.stanton.dtcc.edu/stanton/cs/rfc1855.htmll [20.11.2013].
Hartford, B. S. & K. Bardovi-Harlig. 1996. “At your earliest convenience”: A study of written student requests to faculty. In L. F. Bouton (ed.) Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, 7. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
House, j. 1996. Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness. SSLA 18, 225–252.
Hughes, S. W. 2002. E-mail etiquette. Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University. [Internet]. Available at: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/pw/p_e-mailett.html [20.11.2013].
Inglis, N. L. 1998. Worlds apart: Cross-cultural undercurrents in the use of e-mail and the Internet. Language International 10 (2), 16–17.
Kasange, L. A. 1998. Requests in English by second-language users. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 123–153.
Kasper, G. 1992. Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research 8 (3), 203–231.
Kasper, G. & K. Rose. 2001. Pragmatics in language teaching. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.)
Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: CUP, 1–9.
Kasper, G. & S. Blum-Kulka. 1993. Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. In G.
Kasper & S. Blum Kulka (eds.) Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: OUP, 3–17.
Kim, I. O. 2000. Relationship of onset age of ESL acquisition and extent of informal input to appropriateness and nativeness in performing four speech acts in English: A study of native Korean adult speakers of ESL. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI. Dissertation Abstracts International.
Kim, j. 1995. “Could you calm down more?”: Requests and Korean ESL learners. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 11(2), 67–82.
Kitao, K. 1990. A study of japanese and American perceptions of politeness in requests. Doshisha Studies in English 50, 178–210.
Lan, L. 2000. E-mail: A challenge to standard English? English Today 16 (4), 23–29.
Li, D. 2000. The pragmatics of making requests in the L2 workplace: A case study of language socialization. The Canadian Modern Language Review 57 (1), 58–87.
Mach, T. & S. Ridder. In Press. E-mail requests. Included in course packet for SLS 730: Seminar in Second Language Education, Professor Gabriele Kasper.
Rinaldi, A. H. 1998. The Net: User Guidelines and Netiquette. [Internet]. Available at: http:// www.fau.edu/netiquette/net/ [20.11.2013].
Rose, K. R. 1994. Pragmatic consciousness-raising in an EFL context. In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (eds.) Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series 5. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 52–63.
Rose, K. R. 1999. Teachers and students learning about requests in Hong Kong. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: CUP, 167– 180.
Rose, K. R. & G. Kasper (eds.). 2001. Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: CUP. Schmidt, R. 1993. Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.) Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: OUP, 21–42.
Schmidt, T. Y. 1994. Authenticity in ESL: A study of requests. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Southern Illinois University.
Shea, V. 1994. Netiquette. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.albion.com/netiquette/book/index.html [20.11.2013].
St. john, E. & D. Cash. 1995. German language learning via e-mail: A case study. ReCALL 7 (2), 47–51.
Suh, j. S. 1999. ESL Korean learners’ decision-making processes in the performance of the speech act of requests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Seattle, WA.
Swales, j. M. & C. B. Feak. 2000. English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Takahashi, S. 2001. The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: CUP, 80–102.
Tateyama, Y. 2001. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimasen. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: CUP, 200–222.
Trosborg, A. 1995. Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Warschauer, M. 1995. E-mail for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Weasenforth, D. In Press. What do you think? Requesting responses from professors. Included in course packet for SLS 730: Seminar in Second Language Education, Professor Gabriele Kasper.
Weasenforth, D. & S. Biesenbach-Lucas. 2000. “Please help me”: L1/L2 variations in solicitations in electronic conferences. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum. Madison, WI.
Yoshimi, D. R. 2001. Explicit instruction and jFL learner’s use of interactional discourse markers. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: CUP, 223–244.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
