The Paradigm of Cultural Hybridity in the Postcolonial Discourse


  • Christina-Georgiana Voicu


cultural hybridity, alterity, transcultural forms, colonial discourse, postcolonial, ambivalence


In a broad view, culture has two primary operative functions: one is to endorse the ‘fixed tablet of tradition’ and the second is to provide a location for the progression of culture through generations and time. This paper refers to the process of cultural change and hybridization, one way to distinguish between these two cultural forces is that fixed tradition is not geographically, whereas as hybridisation is often specifically related to place, locale and situation. The rhetoric of hybridity or the hybrid talk is associated with the emergence of postcolonial discourse and its critiques of cultural imperialism. This stage in the history of hybridity is characterised by literature and theory that focuses on the effects of mixture upon identity and culture. Cultural hybridity produces new forms of alterity and is inherent in processes of social and cultural dynamics. A sharp contrast between cultures and hybrids is the notion of choice in cultural referent. This choice is significant because in cultural hybrids, traditions are loosened, and the capacity to make choices allowed. Cultural hybridity therefore, represents a cultural dynamism. This ferment of culture is found on the borders, in the overlaps, and the in-between places between two or more cultures.


Aschroft, B., G. Griffiths and H. Tiffins (eds). 2003. Postcolonial Studies: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

Ashcroft, B., G. Griffiths and H. Tiffin (eds). 1995. The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London: Routledge.

Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Bhabha, H. 1996. Cultures in Between. In S. Hall and P. DuGay (ed.) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage Publications, 190.

Brah, A. and A. Combs. 2000. Hybridity and its Discontents. London: Routledge.

Chambers, I. and L. Curtis (eds). 1996. The Post-colonial Question. London: Routledge.

Clifford, J. 2000. Taking Identity Politics Seriously: “The Contradictory Stony Ground...”. In P. Gilroy, L. Grossberg and A. McRobbie (eds.) Without Guarantees: In Honour of Stuart Hall. London: Verso, 103.

Connolly, W.E. 1991. Identity/Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Fuss, D. 1991. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature & Difference. New York: Routledge.

Gilroy, P. 2000. Between Camps. London: Penguin.

Gilroy, P. 1994. The Black Atlantic. London: Verso.

Hall, S. 1996. When was the Postcolonial: Thinking About the Limit. In I. Chambers and L. Curtis (eds). The Post-colonial Question. London: Routledge, 259.

Hoogvelt, A. 1997. Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Mercer, K. 1994. Welcome to the Jungle: New Positions in Black Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

Papastergiadis, N. 2000. The Turbulence of Migration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Papastergiadis, N. 1997. Tracing Hybridity in Theory. In P. Werbner and T. Modood

Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multi-Cultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism. London: Zed Books, 258-260.

Rutherford, J. 1990. The Third Space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. Identity, Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Said, E. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatus and Windus.

Taylor, P. 1991. The Narrative of Liberation: Perspectives on Afro-Caribbean Literature, Popular Culture and Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Young, R. 1995. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. London: Routledge.




How to Cite

Voicu, C.-G. (2021). The Paradigm of Cultural Hybridity in the Postcolonial Discourse . Philologia, 7(1), 159–166. Retrieved from



Kulturne studije/Cultural Studies